标签： 新加坡管理大学HRM Assignment代写

医学研究表明，吸烟不仅会导致吸烟者的健康问题，而且会导致吸烟者的健康问题。因此，许多人认为公共场所不应该允许吸烟。虽然双方都有争论，但我强烈同意禁止是最恰当的行动。反对这种禁令的反对者有几个原因。首先，他们表示，被动吸烟者可以选择吸入其他人的烟雾，方法是前往允许的地方。如果他们不想被动地吸烟，那么他们不需要访问允许吸烟的地方。另外，他们认为禁令可能会使许多酒吧和酒吧歇业，因为吸烟者不会再去那里了。他们也认为这是一个选择自由的问题。吸烟不违法，所以个人应该有自由吸烟的地方。但是，有更多有说服力的论点赞成禁止。首先，已经证明，烟草由致癌化合物组成，这些致癌化合物不仅对吸烟者造成严重危害，还对人的健康造成严重伤害。身边的任何人都可能患上肺癌，口腔癌和咽喉癌以及身体其他部位的癌症。把这件事强加给另一个人根本不公平。人们的健康也比企业更重要。无论如何，酒吧和餐馆可以通过例如允许吸烟区域来适应禁令。总之，很显然，在公共场所吸烟应该是非法的。这将改善成千上万人的健康状况，这绝对是一个积极的发展。 新加坡管理大学HRM Assignment代写：禁止在公共场所吸烟 Medical studies have shown that smoking not only leads to health problems for the smoker, but also for people close by. As a result of this, many believe that smoking should not be allowed in public places. Although there are arguments on both sides, I strongly agree that a ban is the most appropriate course of action. Opponents of such a ban argue against it for several reasons. Firstly, they say that passive smokers make the choice to breathe in other people’s smoke by going to places where it is allowed. If they would prefer not to smoke passively, then they do not need to visit places where smoking is permitted. In addition, they believe a ban would possibly drive many bars and pubs out of business as smokers would not go there anymore. They also argue it is a matter of freedom of choice. Smoking is not against the law, so individuals should have the freedom to smoke where...